
GLAD Briefs and Annual Report Fall 2023
Plaintiffs in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health
In This Issue
The Dignity and Equality of All Individuals
Celebrating 20 Years Since Goodridge v. DPH Brought the Freedom to Marry to Massachusetts, and Eventually the Nation
An excerpt of this article appears in the November/December 2023 issue of Boston Spirit.
Twenty years ago, on November 18, 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court broke the historic barrier on LGBTQ+ people marrying in its landmark Goodridge v. Department of Public Health decision – making Massachusetts the first state to rule that the freedom to marry, or not, must be equally applicable to LGBTQ+ people. This ruling required opening the door to legal marriages in six months’ time.

In the words of Chief Justice Margaret H. Marshall’s majority opinion, “The Massachusetts Constitution affirms the dignity and equality of all Individuals. It forbids the creation of second-class citizens.” This celebration of the commitment, intimacy, family, and mutuality in marriage continues to be quoted in wedding celebrations in Massachusetts and worldwide.
GLAD filed Goodridge in April 2001 on behalf of 7 couples seeking something both simple and profound: constitutional respect for their personal commitment by ending the exclusion on joining in legal marriage and marriage’s protections, rights, and responsibilities.
With tremendous gratitude and in recognition of their momentous impact on our community, state, and nation, we are thrilled to celebrate the Goodridge plaintiffs as this year’s Spirit of Justice Award Honorees at GLAD’s Spirit of Justice dinner on November 9 in Boston.
We honor Gloria Bailey-Davies, Linda Bailey-Davies, Edward Balmelli, Maureen Brodoff, Gary Chalmers, Rob Compton, Hillary Goodridge, Julie Goodridge, Michael Horgan, Richard Linnell, Gina Nortonsmith, Heidi Nortonsmith, Ellen Wade, and David Wilson.
Each of them authentically gave of themselves and created connections and bridges of understanding with the wider community even while in a crucible of media and political attention and conflict. They advanced equal rights for all of us in Massachusetts and that beacon of hope spread far and wide. With other marriage plaintiffs, including in challenges in Hawaii and Vermont before Goodridge, and cases across the country after, the Goodridge plaintiffs’ full and complete victory paved the way for more.

The reality of people’s marriages in Massachusetts set the stage for dismantling the federal Defense of Marriage Act – first in GLAD’s 2009 challenge in federal court and 2012 unanimous victory at the First Circuit Court of Appeals, and then carried through by other plaintiffs at the Supreme Court in 2013. Community members and organizations, including GLAD, worked together in legislatures and courts across the U.S. In 2013, GLAD was asked to join the team representing plaintiffs in Michigan, in the case that would lead to the Supreme Court Obergefell ruling for marriage equality nationwide in 2015.
Looking back now, it can be tempting to think this was all inevitable. But that is far from true.
It took relentless hard work, commitment, and courage from the 14 plaintiffs, attorneys, amici and their attorneys, and so many others. The Goodridge plaintiffs withstood a trial court loss – expected but still disappointing – and redoubled their efforts to connect with people about why marriage was important to them.
Victory was sweet. The Supreme Judicial Court’s (SJC) beautiful and momentous ruling on November 18, 2003, was a triumph. Even so, it wasn’t the end. The reactions were swift – both the eruption of joy and celebration and also the backlash.
At the same time, the legislature, meeting in a constitutional convention, debated whether to constitutionally ban marriage for same-sex couples or to defend the court’s ruling.
“I stand with the SJC” stickers were everywhere, along with throngs of supporters and opponents inside and outside the State House.
Amidst all of this, couples acted on the simple desire to protect their, in some cases, decades-long love and commitment, and planned wedding celebrations.
This article continues. Read more.
From Departing Executive Director Janson Wu
It is never easy to leave an organization you love.

In my 17 years with GLAD – the last nine as Executive Director – it has been an incredible honor to work alongside a phenomenal team and a devoted community of supporters to advance liberty and equality for LGBTQ+ people.
In my first year as ED, I had the privilege of sitting in the U.S. Supreme Court to watch GLAD attorney Mary Bonauto argue for the freedom to marry nationwide.
Three months later, I listened to Justice Kennedy read his majority decision in Obergefell v. Hodges from the bench.
It began: “The Constitution’s promise of liberty extends to all within its reach.”
With those words, thousands of LGBTQ+ couples were granted access not only to a cherished social institution, but a fundamental Constitutional right and marker of equal citizenship.
Many commentators at the time myopically claimed that our victory was always inevitable – a result of generational change.
But we know better.
We understand that while the promise of liberty is embedded in our Constitution, its reach has never been guaranteed. Millions have fought decade after decade to extend that reach so that all Americans, including LGBTQ+ Americans, could take one step closer to full belonging.
And we have many more steps to take.
Nothing is inevitable, as we know too painfully well from the scores of anti-LGBTQ+ attacks we are fighting today.
As we look back at GLAD’s historic victory 20 years ago in Goodridge v. Dept of Public Health, which made Massachusetts the first state in the country to allow same-sex couples to marry and paved the way for Obergefell, we know that our progress has never been guaranteed.
It has been earned through hard work and perseverance.
We can never stop working to extend the reach of liberty – not until we reach some final endpoint of justice, but rather in service of justice.
While I prepare to begin a new chapter with the Trevor Project, I am thrilled to join you in serving justice as a GLAD supporter.
Our community and our country are facing difficult fights ahead, and I cannot imagine an organization more prepared to lead those fights than GLAD.
With the interim stewardship of veteran LGBTQ+ leader and founding board chair Richard Burns, I know that GLAD is on strong footing to continue its critical work. And I know that the incredible GLAD community of staff, board, and supporters will find the right next leader to shepherd and grow GLAD’s capacity to expand the reach of liberty throughout the country and advance an anti-racist and intergenerational justice movement for decades to come.
I cannot wait to follow all of GLAD’s victories going forward, as a current donor, former ED, and forever member of the GLAD community.
It is through community that we will survive, thrive, and advance the reach of liberty and justice for all.
And what a fabulous and diverse community it is – it has been an honor to serve you all.
Thank you for being with me on this incredible journey.
Until the next GLAD event,
Janson Wu

GLAD Staff
Richard Burns, Interim Executive Director
Carole Allen-Scannell, Director of Development
Josh Arsenault, Assistant Director of Development
Mary L. Bonauto, Senior Director of Civil Rights and Legal Strategies
Eva Boyce, Chief Financial Officer
Gary Buseck, Senior Advisor
Patience Crozier, Director of Family Advocacy
Braedyn Dorn, Public Affairs and Education Assistant
Courtney Dougherty, Constitutional Law Fellow
Chris Erchull, Attorney
Kendrick Foster, Legal Assistant
Beth Grierson, Assistant Director of Operations and Administration
Kayden Hall, GLAD Answers Coordinator
Gabrielle Hamel, Public Information Manager
Michael Johnson, Chief Legal Officer
Amanda Johnston, Director of Public Affairs and Education
Ivory King, Assistant Director of Communications and Public Engagement
Bennett Klein, Senior Director of Litigation and HIV Law
Jennifer L. Levi, Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights
Ben Marcus, Constitutional Law Fellow
Carol Marton, Business Manager
Qwin Mbabazi, Senior Manager of Organizational Culture and Community Partnerships
Mads Ouellette, Database Systems and Development Communications Coordinator
Renae Paulson, Development Assistant
Michelle Peng, Individual Giving and Special Events Coordinator
Aria Pierce, Manager of Institutional Giving
Jo Troll, Finance and Operations Coordinator
Bob Tumposky, IT Manager
Aaron Wolfson, Digital Media Manager
Jessica Vocaturo, Legal Research and Operations Manager
Board of Directors
Shane Dunn, President
Mario Nimock, Vice President
Marlene Seltzer, Treasurer
Joseph Metmowlee
Garland, Clerk
Annika Bockius-Suwyn
Jean-Phillip Brignol
Mark Brimhall-Vargas, PhD
Darian M. Butcher
Edward Byrne
Dallas M. Ducar, MSN, RN, PMHNP-BC, CNL
Matthew McGuirk
Beth R. Myers
Lee Swislow
Jacob Smith Yang
Defending Our Common Humanity
Far-right attacks are putting transgender youth and their families directly in harm’s way and putting all of us at risk. We are fighting back.

We all deserve to live and love freely and be supported and celebrated for who we are. The current onslaught of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation is taking aim at those fundamental ideals, with devastating consequences for children, families, and all of us.
Since 2021, 22 states have passed transgender healthcare bans and 23 states have barred transgender kids as young as elementary school from playing school sports. Multiple states have passed some version of a “Don’t Say Gay or Trans” law censoring teachers, schools, and students. Others have made it impossible for transgender and gender diverse students to use the restroom at school.
A handful of states now require schools to out students to parents, a policy far-right groups are pushing for in the courts and local communities as well. Such policies interfere with teachers’ ability to support their students and to help ensure parents have the resources they need to support their LGBTQ+ children.
“We will support these parents and their kids in pushing back against that dangerous reality on every level.
– Jennifer Levi, Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights
States are trying to ban drag shows and keep books about LGBTQ+ families out of school libraries.
The far right is advancing its anti-democratic agenda on the backs of transgender and LGBQ+ youth and adults. Fortunately, those of us who believe in freedom and our common humanity are fighting back.
GLAD is in the thick of the fight, directly challenging laws in Alabama, Florida, and New Hampshire, and supporting our partner organizations in other legal battles across the country.
In Alabama, we are challenging the criminal ban on medical care for transgender adolescents.
Last year, we presented two days of testimony in federal court from medical and scientific experts, transgender adolescents, and their parents. The Court concluded, as every other district court judge across the country to hear the facts since has, that there is no justifiable reason for the state to categorically ban access to safe, established, and necessary medical care simply because someone is transgender.
A panel of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals recently reversed the district court’s ruling. We are asking the full 11th Circuit to reconsider the panel opinion and preserve the injunction barring the law from being enforced.
In Florida, where another district court also preliminarily blocked a law banning care for transgender adolescents, we are preparing for a full trial this December. We are also challenging restrictions put on transgender adults’ ability to obtain gender transition-related health care.
These laws target transgender people and put parents in the excruciating position of not being able to provide their adolescent children with the care they know they need to thrive.
As Jennifer Levi, Senior Director of Transgender and Queer Rights and GLAD’s lead attorney in Alabama and Florida put it: “We will support these parents and their kids in pushing back against that dangerous reality on every level.”
In New Hampshire, we are challenging a school censorship law that chills teachers’ ability to talk to students honestly about race, disability, and LGBTQ+ identities.

Throughout New England we have worked overtime the past three sessions to stop the same harmful anti-LGBTQ+ bills we are seeing across the country.
That includes successfully defeating a bill last year that would have reversed New Hampshire’s ban on the debunked and dangerous practice of so-called conversion therapy. An attempt to challenge another state’s conversion therapy ban is pending consideration at the U.S. Supreme Court.
It can sometimes feel like these attacks came out of nowhere. But we know better. Our community has made tremendous progress over the past 20 years and the right is trying hard to reverse that.
Two decades ago, we began to see states passing express protections against discrimination for transgender people. Today, nearly half the states have such laws on the books.
We are fighting for our freedom, for our right to be ourselves, to live and love fully, and to celebrate our shared humanity. It’s a fight we can’t afford to lose.
Legal victories, educational research, and community advocacy have brought schools to a place of deeper understanding about the importance and fairness of supporting transgender students to express themselves and be respected for who they are.
The medical community has developed policies and practices to make safe and effective treatments for gender dysphoria more accessible. More and more families have the tools to understand and support their transgender children.
In 2020, the Supreme Court affirmed that discrimination on the basis of transgender status and sexual orientation is unlawful under federal law. And earlier this year, the Supreme Court declined to review a landmark ruling from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirming that the Americans with Disabilities Act protects transgender people from disability discrimination.
Increased visibility and understanding of our lives and increased legal protections have all made it more possible for transgender and LGBQ+ people to fully participate in civic life – to live and love freely, to be embraced by families and integrated fully into our communities.
Now, a deliberate effort by influential politically motivated actors seeks to replace our shared humanity with fear and disinformation.
Our power lies in collective action—advocating in courts and in legislatures, and engaging at the ballot box, in grassroots activism, and in everyday conversations.
And the good news is – even now – when we fight, we can win.
Over 500 anti-LGBTQ+ bills were introduced across the country this year – and the vast, vast majority of those were defeated. When federal courts have had the chance to hear our full arguments and truly understand the impact of these laws on people’s lives, we’ve won. Far too many hostile bills have passed, to be sure. But we also can’t lose sight of how many we have defeated.
And while it sometimes seems like we are exclusively playing defense, we are also still advancing laws to protect our community.
This year, Michigan became the 23rd state, along with DC and the U.S. Virgin Islands, to provide comprehensive nondiscrimination protections for LGBTQ+ people.
15 states have adopted “provider shield laws” that protect access to medical care for transgender people – GLAD worked with state partners to pass such laws in Massachusetts and Vermont, with more to come.
In Maine this year we helped pass a law that creates a pathway for 16- and 17-year-old transgender adolescents to get medical care in the extraordinary circumstances where a parent objects to care even though denying it results in harm.
Those who want to move us backward and put our community in harm’s way have a lot of power and resources, it’s true. We have our work cut out for us, and we know we won’t win every fight. But we are fighting for our freedom, for our right to be ourselves, to live and love fully, and to celebrate our shared humanity.
That’s a fight we can’t afford to lose.
Texas Ruling Could Lead to New HIV Cases
A case currently before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals could lead to tens of thousands of new and preventable HIV cases.
HIV PrEP (Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis) is an extraordinary medical breakthrough that reduces the risk of HIV transmission by close to one hundred percent. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), insurers are required to cover PrEP and other critical preventive care services without charging copays or deductibles, referred to as cost sharing. Last spring, however, a federal district judge in Texas issued a ruling in Braidwood v. Becerra blocking that requirement.

GLAD, with law firm Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky, and Popeo, P.C., filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the appeal of the Braidwood ruling at the Fifth Circuit on behalf of HIV Medicine Association (HMA) and the National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors (NASTAD).
HMA and NASTAD represent thousands of healthcare providers, public officials responsible for stopping the epidemic from every state, and policy experts with expertise in the treatment and prevention of HIV and the demographics and dynamics of the epidemic.
In their brief the organizations issue a dire warning: reinstating cost sharing for PrEP will significantly decrease utilization of PrEP, cause tens of thousands of new and preventable HIV cases, with billions of dollars in associated healthcare costs, and reverse the progress our nation has made towards curbing, and ultimately ending, the HIV epidemic.
“As an organization representing thousands of physicians and other health care professionals working on the frontlines of the HIV epidemic in communities across the country, we are deeply concerned about the harmful and far-reaching impacts this decision will have if allowed to stand,” said Michelle Cespedes, MD, MS, Chair, HIVMA.
The brief analyzes the consequences of a recent epidemiological analysis conducted by experts at Harvard and Yale predicting, under the most cautious and conservative estimates, that blocking the ACA’s no cost sharing provision for PrEP will result in an additional 2,057 HIV infections in the first year alone.
Playing out the study’s straightforward assessment of additional first-year HIV diagnoses, an additional predicted 1,892 secondary infections bring that number to 3,949 people with HIV in just the first year, which will cost the healthcare system a staggering $1.66 billion.
Extending that conservative model just five years into the future predicts approximately an additional 20,000 people with HIV and costs to the United States healthcare system of over $8 billion as a result of the reimposition of barriers to accessing PrEP.
The brief also provides the Court of Appeals with important historical and current-day information about the tremendous toll the HIV epidemic has had on millions of lives, as well as the role discrimination and stigma have played in preventing Americans from accessing highly effective prevention and treatment. While the ruling from the Texas court broadly enjoined the cost-sharing mandate for all recommended preventive services, the case began as a challenge specifically to the requirement to cover PrEP without copays or deductibles.
“The Braidwood decision is rooted in stigma and bigotry towards the LGBTQ+ community and people vulnerable to HIV,” said Dr. Stephen Lee, NASTAD Executive Director. “It will cause incalculable harm to our efforts to end the HIV epidemic.”
Urging the Court of Appeals to understand the devastating consequences for HIV prevention if the District Court’s decision stands, the brief also describes the sobering and unacceptable racial/ethnic and geographic disparities in both the epidemic’s impact and access to PrEP. The most recent CDC estimates from 2021 are that only 11% of Black people and 20% of Hispanic/Latino people who could benefit from PrEP were prescribed it, as opposed to 78% of White people.
“Copays and deductibles deter people from accessing healthcare,” said Ben Klein, Senior Director of Litigation and HIV Law at GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders. “PrEP is nearly 100% effective at preventing transmission of HIV, but it is already underutilized, particularly among Black and Latino communities. Allowing the lower court’s ruling in Braidwood v. Becerra to stand will exacerbate racial health disparities, needlessly increase HIV diagnoses, and cost American lives.”
As we await a ruling from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, GLAD is advocating for other approaches to protect and expand access to PrEP. State legislatures have the power to not only codify the ACA’s no cost-sharing requirement under state law, but to go further by ensuring all forms of PrEP, including long-acting injectables, are available to all who can benefit from them. Barriers like co-pays, deductibles, and insurance pre-authorization requirements mean delays in access to PrEP that can lead to avoidable HIV infections with serious health consequences and even death.
PrEP offers us a powerful path to finally end the HIV epidemic. We only need the will, and good health policy, to embrace it.
We Can’t Leave Anyone Behind
Meet Interim Executive Director Richard Burns
Lifelong LGBTQ+ Activist and GLAD Interim Executive Director Richard Burns Cites the Need for Vigilance in the Battle for Full LGBTQ+ Equality and Liberation

As GLAD prepares to begin a robust national search for the leader who will steer the organization’s next chapter, the board is pleased to bring on lifelong LGBTQ+ activist Richard Burns as Interim Executive Director. Richard began his tenure on October 10.
“Leadership transitions are important milestones in any organization at any time,” says GLAD Board President Shane Dunn. “When the rights of LGBTQ+ people, and especially transgender people, are so virulently under attack across the country, and threats to our democracy are creating new barriers to our mission of realizing LGBTQ+, racial, HIV, and gender justice, we recognize an even greater responsibility to be thorough and thoughtful in this process.”
“We must have a commitment to vigilance, always. The battle for LGBTQ+ equality and liberation will go on for generations. We have to have heart. We have to have grit. We have to have resilience and hope.”
Richard Burns
“With significant leadership experience, including multiple tenures as an interim Executive Director, and a deep commitment to GLAD’s goals as an anti-racist, intergenerational legal advocacy organization, Richard will be able to support GLAD’s ongoing critical work with minimal disruption, allowing us the time to develop a careful search process and a diverse, talented, and passionate candidate pool for GLAD’s next permanent Executive Director,” Dunn adds.
Richard’s passion for justice and commitment to advancing equality has led him from Boston to New York and across the country as an advocate and organizational leader. He served more than twenty years as Executive Director of the New York City Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Community Center beginning at the height of the AIDS crisis, and later developed and led the LGBT Leadership Initiative previously housed at the Arcus Foundation.
In recent years, he has effectively steered several social and racial justice-focused organizations through transition periods as an interim ED, including the Drug Policy Alliance, the North Star Fund, the Funding Exchange, Funders for LGBTQ Issues, the Stonewall Community Foundation, Lambda Legal, and, most recently the Johnson Family Foundation.
But “Boston formed me,” Richard says, speaking of his roots in the LGBTQ+ legal advocacy movement and, specifically, with GLAD.
In addition to co-founding the Massachusetts LGBTQ+ Bar Association and the Boston Lesbian & Gay Policy Alliance in 1982, he was president of GLAD’s founding board from 1978-1986 and has maintained his commitment to the organization for 45 years.
He talks of GLAD’s radical founding by John Ward at a time when movements for LGBTQ+, racial, and gender justice were converging, and new organizations began to spring up together to advance liberation for all people. On his first day of law school at Northeastern in 1980, Richard met the late Urvashi Vaid – long-time LGBTQ+ activist and a former GLAD Spirit of Justice honoree – who would become a lifelong friend, a GLAD colleague as an early legal intern, and an inspiration in conceptualizing revolutionary, inclusive queer liberation. Richard is chair of the founding Board of the American LGBTQ+ Museum, an in-development project co-founded by Urvashi, among others, to preserve, research, and share LGBTQ+ history and culture.

In the late 1970s, Richard was managing editor of the Boston-based national feminist, progressive LGBTQ+ newsweekly Gay Community News (GCN), which both chronicled and shaped intersectional queer activism at the time. GCN had an active early prison pen pal program, and Richard was a plaintiff in a successful lawsuit when the U.S. Bureau of Prisons declared GCN and another publication, the Task Force’s It’s Time, obscene and tried to block distribution to incarcerated individuals.
Richard also has the rare distinction of involvement with all three of our major LGBTQ+ legal organizations. In addition to his founding role with GLAD, Richard clerked at the National Center for Lesbian Rights while in law school and served on the board of Lambda Legal beginning in 1980.
In preparing to take on the Interim Director role at GLAD at this pivotal moment, Richard is clear that we must take lessons both from the early days of LGBTQ+ and AIDS activism and draw on the wisdom of today’s justice fighters – working with, and learning from, all movements for liberation.
“We all bring all of our identities with us everywhere. In order to build a just society, we’ve got to take into account all of our collective identities. We can’t leave anyone behind,” Richard says.
Recognizing that the far right has all of us in its sights–our movements for reproductive justice, racial equity, LGBTQ+ liberation, and beyond – he adds:
“We must have a commitment to vigilance, always. The battle for LGBTQ+ equality and liberation will go on for generations. We have to have heart. We have to have grit. We have to have resilience and hope.”
Opportunities to Meet GLAD’s Interim Executive Director:
Wednesday, October 25: Defining Gay Community News
Richard Burns will moderate a panel celebrating the 50th anniversary of Gay Community News on Wednesday, October 25, 6 p.m., at the Massachusetts Historical Society. Visit the History Project for details.
Thursday, November 9: Spirit of Justice
Richard will speak at our annual Spirit of Justice Award Dinner. Visit www.GLAD.org/SOJ to join us.
Legal Update
Litigation
Bernier v. Turbocam
A business owner’s religious beliefs must never be a legal justification to deprive an employee of necessary healthcare.
GLAD represents Lillian Bernier, who was denied coverage for medically necessary care by her employer’s self-funded health plan, which has a total exclusion of benefits for gender transition medical care. Lillian is a machinist at Turbocam, Inc., and a mother of two. But unlike her colleagues, she has had to pay out-of-pocket for essential medical care. Turbocam, a large, profitable company that manufactures parts for the aerospace, automotive, and HVAC industries, claims that the owner’s religious beliefs exempt them from following federal and state nondiscrimination laws – but there is no justifiable reason for the company to treat Lillian differently than other employees just because she is transgender.
Lillian’s case is currently at the New Hampshire Human Rights Commission and we will soon file in federal court. GLAD will also include Massachusetts-based Harvard Pilgrim and Health Plans, Inc. in the suit because they contract with Turbocam to administer the plan and provide their expertise and services to aid in its discriminatory health benefits plan.
Doe v. Austin
GLAD has sued the Department of Defense in federal court in Maine in a challenge to an antiquated federal statute that prohibits the military’s healthcare program from providing coverage for gender transition surgeries to dependents of military personnel. The law firm Orrick, Herrington, and Sutcliffe LLP are co-counsel.
Dependents of active-duty military personnel are entitled to healthcare benefits through the federal government, administered by an entity called TRICARE, which is part of the Department of Defense. Like other service members, our client John Doe receives healthcare coverage for himself and his family through TRICARE.
John and his college-aged daughter Joan are challenging the law that excludes coverage for transgender dependents’ medically necessary care as a violation of constitutional rights to Equal Protection and Due Process, and as a violation of the federal Rehabilitation Act. Military personnel with transgender family members deserve the same family healthcare access as their military colleagues.
Doe v. Horne
GLAD, the Human Rights Campaign, and the National Center for Transgender Equality submitted a brief to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding Arizona’s law that bans transgender girls and women from school sports teams.
The brief outlines how the law both warrants—and fails— heightened constitutional scrutiny as a transgender-status-based classification and fails even rational basis review as a policy enacted specifically to disadvantage transgender girls and women.
Fighting anti-transgender birth certificate laws
Having up-to-date government issued documents is essential for many important life events as well as personal safety. But some states are categorically banning transgender and nonbinary people from amending their birth certificate to reflect their accurate gender marker. GLAD filed a brief in a legal challenge to such a policy in Oklahoma, and will file briefs in similar lawsuits in Tennessee and Kansas.
Foote v. Ludlow School Committee
GLAD represents the Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents (MASS) in a friend-of-the-court brief filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit defending a common-sense school policy that provides a supportive educational environment and strengthens family communication rather than forcing schools to “out” students before they are ready.
In the case, parents challenged actions taken by teachers and staff at a Ludlow school to support the well-being of two students, including using the students’ requested names and pronouns and waiting to share that information with the parents until the students themselves were ready to do so or finished doing so. The District Court dismissed the case, concluding that the plaintiffs did not present adequate specific facts supporting a legal claim that the school’s actions were a violation of their rights as parents. Our brief presents research about the importance of providing a supportive school environment to ensure positive educational outcomes. By highlighting the role of trusted relationships with and support from teachers and school staff in students’ academic achievement and performance, the brief argues that courts should not disrupt the traditional deference accorded to educators about how to teach and support student learning.
Mejia v. Edelblut
GLAD is part of a broad coalition of educators, advocacy groups, and law firms challenging New Hampshire’s ‘banned concepts’ law. In August, we filed new briefs in federal court asking for a declaration that the law is unconstitutional. The briefs highlight how the law actively discourages public school teachers from teaching and talking about race, gender, sexual orientation, disability, and gender identity inside and outside the classroom.
Mejia v. Edelblut (cont’d)
Previously, in January, after the state asked the federal court to dismiss the lawsuit, the judge ruled that the case would continue, concluding that the law does “not give teachers fair notice of what they can and cannot teach,” and adding, “[g]iven the severe consequences that teachers face if they are found to have taught or advocated a banned concept, plaintiffs have pleaded a plausible claim that the amendments are unconstitutionally vague.”
LGBTQ+, BIPOC, and students with disabilities are being especially harmed by this law, and its chilling effect is doing a severe disservice to all students when their teachers can’t ensure they gain a full, rich understanding of history and the people and world around them.
Pueblo v. Haas
In July, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled that Carrie Pueblo has a right to make the case that she is an equitable parent to the child born to her and her former partner during the couple’s relationship, and to petition for custody and parenting time. This is an important ruling for the rights of children and LGBTQ+ parents in Michigan and supports the case for updating and clarifying parentage laws in the state – an effort that GLAD is supporting in states across the country. GLAD joined a friend-of-the-court brief in the case with the ACLU of Michigan, Lambda Legal Defense & Education Fund, LGBTQA Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan, Affirmations LGBTQ+ Community Center, and the National Center for Lesbian Rights.
Carrie Pueblo and Rachel Haas—partners in a committed same-sex relationship—chose to have a child together using assisted insemination, with Ms. Haas carrying the child. When their child was born in November 2008, same-sex couples were not permitted to marry in Michigan, and the couple’s relationship ended before the freedom to marry was legalized in the state with Obergefell. After their separation, Ms. Haas denied Ms. Pueblo all contact with the child she had raised since birth. Ms. Pueblo filed suit in family court seeking shared custody and parenting time, but both the trial court and Michigan Court of Appeals held that because she is not the child’s biological mother, she did not have standing. This left Ms. Pueblo as a legal stranger to her own child.
Legislation
Confirmatory Adoption to Protect Children Born Through Assisted Reproduction
Rhode Island and Maine continue to be leaders in supporting and protecting LGBTQ+ people and families with the passage of new laws that make it easier for parents who have had a child through assisted reproduction to confirm their parentage through adoption. “An Act Relating to Domestic Relations — Adoption Of Children,” championed by State Senator Dawn Euer and Representative Rebecca Kislak, was signed into law June 19 in Rhode Island. “An Act to Enable Confirmatory Adoption,” was sponsored by Representative Matt Moonen and signed into law June 28 in Maine. The laws remove cumbersome and costly barriers that non-biological parents face when adopting their own children, making it easier for them to secure an adoption decree to reflect their parentage. This gives families greater protection when they travel or move outside their home state —especially to areas that are less LGBTQ-friendly. GLAD is continuing to advocate for laws across the country to protect LGBTQ+ families, and these two new New England laws provide important security for our communities.
Ensuring and Expanding Access to PrEP
GLAD continues our efforts to ensure that anyone who needs access to PrEP can receive it. In Massachusetts, we are advocating for legislation to allow pharmacists to dispense an initial supply of PrEP without requiring a doctor’s prescription, as well as for legislation to ensure all forms of PrEP, including long-acting injectables, are available without co-pays or required pre-authorization. “An Act to Address Barriers to HIV Prevention Medication” and “An Act Enabling Pharmacists to prescribe, dispense and, administer PrEP” are both sponsored by Representative Jack Lewis and Senator Julian Cyr.
The Massachusetts Parentage Act
Currently in Massachusetts, many children of LGBTQ+ parents lack equal pathways for their relationships with their parents to be legally recognized, leaving them vulnerable. The Massachusetts Parentage Act (MPA) (H 1713/S 947) ensures equality for LGBTQ+ families. It creates clear and accessible paths to establish legal parentage for all children so that the parent-child relationship is secure from the outset.
“An Act to Ensure Legal Parentage Equality” is sponsored by Representatives Hannah Kane and Sarah Peake and State Senators Julian Cyr and Bruce Tarr.
Momentum is growing to pass this bill, which is long overdue. Our coalition of organizations supporting the MPA has grown to 53 organizations, and this summer Governor Healey’s office went on record in support. Join the work to pass the MPA this session at massparentage.org. Sign up for updates, share your story, or get support to write testimony before the hearing to help this crucial bill pass this session.
Visit Cases and Advocacy to see GLAD’s full current litigation and legislation docket.
Protecting LGBTQ+ Students
Creating Safe and Inclusive Schools Together

All students deserve to feel safe and included at school and have an educational environment that welcomes and affirms their full identities.
Research demonstrates that such positive school climates are necessary for all youth to learn and thrive. For many LGBTQ+ students, this journey includes sharing their identity with their friends or a trusted teacher before they’re ready to do so at home. While most youth want to and do come out to their family in their own time, some are losing that choice. Far-right legal groups are challenging these positive school policies, and some states are enacting laws that would force faculty to contact students’ homes before the students are ready, under the guise of “parents’ rights.”
The past few years of intense political scrutiny and legislative attacks have taken a toll on young people’s mental health and led to trans and LGBQ youth experiencing increased harassment. And so-called “parents’ rights” bills have made it less safe for young people who can’t be their authentic selves with their families. Teachers care about their students and know that generally, kids do better when they can talk to their parents. But sadly, that’s not an option for some youth, leading them to feel isolated both at home and school. But we are fighting to protect all youth, whether they cannot come out at home or need support to discuss their identities with their parents when they are ready.
These “forced outing” bills directly contradict schools’ responsibility to create a supportive educational environment. Federal constitutional protections and many state-based laws are in place to safeguard the rights of LGBTQ+ students. Nevertheless, even in states with explicit obligations to protect LGBTQ+ youth, a vocal minority is attempting to deny young people the autonomy to choose when and how to share their identities with their families.
In September, The First Circuit Court of Appeals heard Foote v. Town of Ludlow, which centers on this issue. We submitted a friend-of-the-court brief with the Massachusetts Superintendent’s Association, sharing research that shows positive school climates and trusted relationships with adults are critical to academic success for all students.
“When teachers and other educators acknowledge and respect students, including their requested names and pronouns, that creates the safety that allows brain development and learning to flourish while also meeting the requirement of equal educational opportunity,” said Mary Bonauto, Senior Director of Civil Rights and Legal Strategies, at the filing.
GLAD is committed to protecting students and ensuring schools can create positive, inclusive learning environments. But parents and allies can make an impact too.
In addition to supporting GLAD in this crucial work, you can advocate for the LGBTQ+ youth in your life by checking out our website’s school resources page. You’ll find information on LGBTQ+ student rights, bullying protections, and guidance for schools in every New England state and across the country. We’ve also included resources from our partners on inclusion for transgender students in school sports and all areas of academic life, how to advocate for positive school climates, resources for educators, and more.
Familiarizing yourself with these resources can help you advocate for youth and encourage schools to meet their responsibility to ensure equal education and safety for all students. Public schools and many private schools are legally obligated to act when students face bullying and other kinds of mistreatment or harassment so that all students can learn and thrive.
If you need further support, GLAD Answers can provide free and confidential legal information and assistance.
Goodridge and Beyond: From the First Weddings to the Supreme Court
The Dignity and Equality of All Individuals
(Read the first part of this article)
Finally, May 17, 2004, dawned with early morning talk shows and LGBTQ+ people and allies supporting couples seeking to marry in cities and towns across the Commonwealth.
“The Massachusetts Constitution affirms the dignity and equality of all Individuals. It forbids the creation of second-class citizens.”
– Chief Justice Margaret H. Marshall
The joy was palpable as Massachusetts, with the eyes of the nation on us, inaugurated the first legally-recognized marriages of same-sex couples in the country.
And still, there was work to do. There were multiple more constitutional convention sessions and lawsuits about required procedures. Most importantly, the people of the Commonwealth were engaged with their elected officials, neighbors, and family members.
Finally, the legislature conclusively rejected the last proposed constitutional amendment in June 2007 with over ¾ of the vote of the House and Senate. The Commonwealth had taken a cue from the Goodridge plaintiffs in finding common ground and our common humanity.
It was official – marriage equality was now here to stay in Massachusetts.
The legal victory and the incredible defense mounted by everyday people in Massachusetts to protect it created momentum for equality, but national progress was still infuriatingly slow.
Politicians seeking to create fear and win power seized on our community’s fight for basic dignity and human rights – something we are seeing again today. State laws were changed to ban marriage and cut off any legal protections for a couple’s relationship. Hostile politicians drove a wave of constitutional amendments across the country.
It wasn’t until 2008 that GLAD secured the next lasting court victory, at the Connecticut Supreme Court in Kerrigan and Mock v. Dept. of Public Health. We will be celebrating 15 years of marriage in Connecticut on November 12, just before the 20th anniversary of Goodridge.
After Connecticut, we began to see more state court, legislative, and ballot victories for the freedom to marry.
Crucial legislative victories for marriage equality in the New England States of Vermont, Maine, and New Hampshire proved that we could make change in the democratic process and not only the courts. We had to go back to the ballot in Maine in 2012, which then became the first state to win marriage by popular vote of the people. And in early 2013, our campaign in New England concluded with Rhode Island’s marriage enactment.
Slowly but increasingly perceptibly, more and more of the public were coming to engage the possibility of, and then embracing, the dignity and equality of LGBTQ+ individuals and our relationships.
The journey from a state constitutional law case in Massachusetts to the national marriage victory in Obergefell v. Hodges at the Supreme Court in 2015 results from the changed minds, hard work, courage, resilience, and persistence of so many across society and law. As queer historian George Chauncey has put it though, there would be no Obergefell without Goodridge, and we happily celebrate the 14 trailblazing plaintiffs who led the way.
Cementing Dignity and Equality in Federal Law

In June 2022, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas called for reconsideration of Obergefell – and other key cases protecting individual freedoms – in his concurrence in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health ruling that overturned 50 years of precedent on abortion rights. It was neither the first nor the last time we’ve seen direct threats to marriage equality, but it spurred action years in the making to require state and federal recognition of people’s marriages and forbid discrimination based on the sex, race, or ethnicity of the spouses. With bipartisan support, President Biden signed the federal “Respect for Marriage Act” in December 2022 to provide LGBTQ+ families and others across the country with the assurance that their marriages will continue to be respected by our state and federal governments.
“It takes the efforts of many to bend the arc of history toward justice… Even now there are so many places where people in our community are under attack. The work will continue, but look how far we’ve come.”
– Goodridge plaintiff Heidi Nortonsmith
We are alert to efforts to chip away at civil marriage equality and the equal status of LGBTQ+ people more broadly. This includes creating speech and religious objections to the basic rules of equal treatment, as in this summer’s narrow but alarming Supreme Court 303 Creative ruling and others. We also see it in the widespread state legislative threats to LGBTQ+ people’s making any claims to basic human or legal respect, whether in schools, healthcare settings, the public marketplace, and other areas of daily life. Our community is working overtime to defend and protect one another and affirm what we know is true and right in these extremely challenging times.
While this fight is hard, we know we can fight through losses and gaps in public understanding, as we have with marriage, with laws criminalizing intimacy, with our community’s response to the HIV epidemic, and with two decades of advances in the rights of transgender people, who are now facing devastating backlash. It is never easy or immediate, but when we work together from a place of love and commitment for the long term, we win.
“It takes the efforts of many to bend the arc of history toward justice,” Goodridge plaintiff Heidi Nortonsmith said at the White House signing ceremony for the Respect for Marriage Act. “Even now there are so many places where people in our community are under attack. The work will continue, but look how far we’ve come. The law that President Biden signs today will make people safer, more secure, and less alone. From our family to all of you, thank you for fighting for our equal humanity and dignity. For our right to love and be loved. And for our marriage.”
Unfinished Business: Ensuring Protections for Our Families

Today Massachusetts is proud of its leadership on marriage equality, and rightly so. But twenty years after the landmark Goodridge ruling, the state has unfinished business to ensure LGBTQ+ families – including our children – are fully protected by connecting them legally with their parents. Massachusetts’ statutes on establishing parentage – the legal relationship between a child and their parents – remain decades out of date. As a result, children born to LGBTQ+ families and other children born with the aid of assisted reproduction are left vulnerable, without the security of the law recognizing their relationship to their parents. We need the legislature to act this year to pass the Massachusetts Parentage Act to provide a statutory roadmap that equally protects all families.
The Justice For All Campaign
Expanding GLAD’s Capacity in A Critical Time
Since 1978, GLAD has won landmark victories to promote justice and secure essential rights. The Justice For All Campaign was launched in the fall of 2022 as an instrument to jumpstart significant growth in GLAD’s litigation ability at a time when many of our hard-won rights are under threat.
The campaign embraces GLAD’s power as a cutting-edge legal organization and our commitment to pursuing an American dream that applies to all of us. Funds from the campaign will be used to:
- expand our national impact and defend our community wherever we are needed most,
- grow our legal team to protect LBGTQ people and those living with HIV,
- build the bench of legal leadership for the future, and
- invest in our people and technology allowing GLAD to flourish in a hybrid work environment.
GLAD seeks individuals and corporations interested in driving impact for LGBTQ+ rights nationally and protecting the rights of our community with tax-deductible campaign support. We are proud to announce that to date, we have raised $1.38M towards the campaign goal of $1.85M.
We thank the following early and generous supporters for their investments in striving toward new milestones in the pursuit of justice for all and invite you to join them:
Mark Allen
Bridget Baird and Kristina Duarte
Community Action Partners
Eastern Bank Foundation
Peter Epstein
Kate and Nima Eshghi
Will Evans
Judd Flesch and Timothy Sabol
Gill Foundation
Eric C. Green
Rebecca Hart Holder and Molly Holder
The Herrman Family
Jack Hornor and Ron Skinn
Richard Iandoli
Sarah Kaplan and Anita McGahan
Joyce Kaufman and Annie Weatherwax
Dianne Phillips and Evelyn Kaupp
Andrew and Samuel Pang
Frances Pieters and Anne Guenzel
Robert and Patricia Rivers
Samantha and David Rosman
Evan Schwartz and Robert Fitterman
Jacob Smith Yang and Jason Smith
Edward Snowdon and Duffy Violante
Anne Stanback and Charlotte Kinlock
The Estate of Timothy Stein in Memory of Wayne R. Fette
Scott Webster and Peter Black
William Weiss
Richard Yurko and Jianhua Shi
Putting Your Support To Work!
GLAD is pleased to be adding a number of roles to our team this year. We will soon launch searches for new attorney positions, and the search for an Assistant Director of Planned & Individual Giving is already underway. Please reach out to our recruitment partner, Positively Partners, to learn more about either of these roles via search@positivelypartners.org and keep an eye out for the formal launch of the attorney roles in late October.
Staff Retreat in Boston

Connecting to GLAD’s Mission and Each Other
Like everyone, the COVID pandemic dramatically changed the way GLAD’s staff does our work. As we figure out how to collaborate and spend quality time across departments in a hybrid workplace, we are also facing the challenges of escalating anti-LGBTQ+ legislation and other attacks, which can take a personal toll even as they demand even more of all of us.
In early September, members of GLAD’s staff took the opportunity to get together for a full day of big-picture brainstorming and reinvesting in our connections across the organization, in order to re-energize ourselves and support each other in our ongoing fight for justice.
The passion, resilience and commitment of GLAD staff, the board and our supporters are my main motivator. I wake up each day recalling that four decades ago, those that held the same vision and values that the current staff hold created GLAD because they understood the importance of our work. It was important then, it is more important today. So, I continue to hold that torch, despite the challenging times, keeping at heart that we don’t rest until justice for all is achieved
–Qwin
I’m inspired to keep going during challenging times by remembering how GLAD’s work has impacted my life. My mom was able to marry her wife thanks to GLAD. I also think about the incredible things we’ve accomplished together, like winning the “Yes on 3” campaign to protect trans rights at the ballot box in Massachusetts.
–Beth

We spent the day sharing how we as individuals connect to GLAD‘s mission, as well as filling in the rest of our stories to each other. We talked about what inspires us to keep fighting for our communities during these challenging times, forged relationships with newer staff, and refreshed connections with colleagues we don’t often get to see in our hybrid office.
We ended our day with renewed enthusiasm for our work, appreciation for each other, and a commitment to making room in our hectic schedules for vital connection time. The quotes on this page share a few reflections from that day.
We are grateful to the coordination of GLAD Senior Manager of Organizational Culture and Community Partnerships Qwin Mbabazi and for the generous donation of a workspace by Holland Knight LLC, which made it possible for us to have room to socially distance and share this valuable time.
What we do every day can be emotionally challenging, but deeply rewarding. The fact is, our work impacts real people who are being harmed in our community. Knowing that inspires me, and working alongside people who consistently rise to the occasion with compassion and enthusiasm makes a huge difference.
–Ivory
It was really wonderful to have intergenerational and interdepartmental conversations and connections. We often stick to our own roles and don’t have time to interact with staff outside of our department or sphere, so spending time with people I don’t often get to connect with was awesome.
–Gabrielle
The activities we did and the conversations we had during this retreat really called attention to all the different roles, perspectives, and approaches needed to achieve GLAD’s mission. In this way, I felt the retreat was extremely effective in laying the groundwork for more effective and impactful cross-departmental collaboration
–Jess
What is GLAD’s Legacy Society?
What is GLAD’s Legacy Society?

There are as many ways to help the pursuit of equality as there are personalities in our community. Some are big and flashy; others are small and understated; while others are hard to describe. How you engage with GLAD is unique to you, and we appreciate that.
Among the ways you express your support for our work, a planned gift could enhance your financial well-being and be personally meaningful. In the past year, GLAD has received a variety of gifts that have done just that for the caring individuals who included GLAD in their planning through bequests, property donations, life insurance policies, retirement accounts, and securities. Collectively we refer to this group as our Legacy Society and here is a sampling of the kinds of gifts these thoughtful partners have made:
Cash Bequest
David, Gloria, and Van used cash bequests to support GLAD’s mission. They each added language to their will naming GLAD as a donation recipient. In one case it was for a specific amount; the other two were a percentage split with family and other nonprofits (also called a residual bequest).
Real Estate
Your home, vacation spot, or rental property can be donated to the organization. It will be sold or used as determined by our Board of Directors. Tim left several properties to GLAD in memory of his late partner. Proceeds from those sales will provide critical mission support for years to come.
Life Insurance
Paula had never made a gift to GLAD before, and learned about us when a family member came out as transgender. She had a life insurance policy from a former employer and made GLAD the beneficiary of the policy. Her husband said her intent was to make life easier for everyone who wants to live their authentic life.
Retirement Account
Qualified Charitable Distributions are the amount that those 70½ and older can donate to a nonprofit directly from a taxable individual retirement account instead of taking their required minimum distribution, which would have to be reported as income. Many GLAD donors take advantage of this tax savings, and after years of making these donations directly, Gary also named GLAD as the beneficiary of his retirement account.
Securities
Gifts of stock, mutual funds, and bonds may be made at any time, allowing the donor to give 20% more than selling the assets and then making a cash donation. If you have had the asset for more than a year, you will not have to pay capital gains tax when you donate it directly to a nonprofit. Karen, a long-time Equal Justice Council member, made gifts of securities during her lifetime and also left those assets to GLAD in her estate plan.
“I support GLAD because I know that GLAD’s efforts to defend human rights and preserve marriage equality will require substantial financial resources every year. Marriage equality made a real difference in my life and in the lives of so many in the LGBTQ+ community. The current legal threats from the radical right are very obvious, and GLAD provides our best defense. I am grateful for GLAD’s efforts, and I am proud to support your work.”
–Karen
If you would like to let us know about or need more information on supporting GLAD with any of these types of gifts, please contact Director of Development Carole Allen-Scannell at 617-778-6964 or callenscannell@glad.org.
Interested in joining our team and directly building growth in the LGBTQ+ and HIV justice movement? Consider applying for the position of Assistant Director of Planned & Individual Giving, and manage strategies to facilitate and grow GLAD’s individual and planned giving programs. Apply here today.
A Message from the Chief Financial Officer
GLAD’s financial health is strong.
We have 9.53 months of unrestricted reserves (i.e., net assets) as of March 31, 2023, including board designated net assets (BDNA). There is sufficient cash and investments to meet our obligations. During FY23 and in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards, our lease assets and obligations are now reflected in the Statement of Financial Position. Our financial health is both intentional and important as we make strategic investments in staff, programs, and infrastructure and face an uncertain economy and climate in FY24 and beyond.
FY23 ended with an overall decrease in net assets of $252k. For a non-profit, it is important to look at the components (see table below) and some highlights:
Net Assets: Date
1771710
Operating Fund
1770000
Board Designated
3541710
Total Unrestricted
1103295
With Donor Restrictions
4645005
Total
- The unrestricted fund (without donor restrictions) is up $126k. That increase is comprised of two factors: an operating surplus of $275k and board approved spending of $149k from reserves. The ending balance of $3.6m represents 9.53 months of operating expenses.
- The donor restricted fund consists of cash gifts and pledges restricted by the donor for a specific purpose or timeframe. This fund decreased by $252k, which means ‘releases’ exceeded new restricted gifts in FY23. In other words, we are ‘spending down’ our funded backlog. A reduction or increase in any year tracks the flow of funds available.
During FY23, GLAD received donated legal services of $4.2m. With this additional and significant support, we continued our litigation challenging the state bans on gender affirming care and school curriculum bans.
In FY22, GLAD received a forgivable loan from the Paycheck Protection Program in the amount of $521,565. This loan was forgiven in FY23.
We remain committed to excellence and will carefully monitor our financial results with an eye to the future.
Thank you for investing in GLAD.
Eva N. Boyce, Chief Financial Officer
October 2023
Statement of Activities*
For the 12 month period ended March 31, 2023
Support & Revenue | FY23 |
---|---|
Contributions & Grants | 3,308,271 |
Special Events Revenue, net | 594,047 |
Fees & Program Revenue | 195,480 |
Donated Services (In-Kind Legal Fees) | 4,293,702 |
Total Support & Revenue | $8,391,500 |
Expenses | FY22 |
---|---|
Litigation and Public Policy | 7,214,139 |
Public Affairs & Education | 890,901 |
Development & Fundraising | 484,297 |
General & Administrative | 431,422 |
Total Expenses | 9,020,759 |
Change in Net Assets from Operations | (629,259) |
Other Revenue (Expenses) | FY23 |
---|---|
Investment Income, gains & losses | (144,958) |
Forgiveness of loan payable (PPP) | 521,565 |
376,607 | |
Total Change in Net Assets | (252,652)** |
Net Assets, beginning of year | $4,645,005 |
---|---|
Net Assets, end of year | $4,392,353 |


Statement of Financial Position*
March 31, 2023
Assets | FY23 |
---|---|
Cash & Cash Equivalents | 320,483 |
Accounts Receivable & Pledges | 195,769 |
Investments | 4,297,424 |
Right-of-Use Lease Assets – Operating | 1,963,300 |
Equipment, deposits & prepaid expenses | 212,994 |
Total Assets | $6,989,970 |
Net Assets | FY23 |
---|---|
Operating | 1,833,623 |
Board Designated | 1,833,795 |
Temporarily Restricted | 724,935 |
Total Net Assets | $4,392,353 |
Liabilities | FY23 |
---|---|
Accounts Payable & Accrued Expenses | 466,881 |
Operating Lease Liabilities net | 2,130,736 |
Total Liabilities | $2,597,617 |
Total Liabilities & Net Assets | $6,989,970 |
---|
*Summarized from GLAD’s audit report; available on our website. See message from the CFO for more information
**See “Change in Net Assets” chart
Thank You
ATTORNEYS
Daniel Ball (MA)
Kevin Barry (CT)
James Barton (DC)
Richard D. Batchelder, Jr. (MA)
Prof. Courtney Beer (ME)
Christopher Berry (ME)
Annika Bockius-Suwyn (MA)
Robert C. Boyd (DC)
Brian Brenehy (CA)
John T. Byrnes (DC)
Catherine Cappelli (MA)
Prof. Maureen Carroll (MI)
Katrina Chapman (MA)
Teresa Cloutier (ME)
Susan Crockin (DC)
Jennifer Fiorica Delgado (NY)
Kathleen DeLisle (MA)
Adriel Cepeda Derieux (NY)
Claudine Columbres (NY)
Christine Dinan (DC)
Catherine J. Djang (NY)
Christopher D. Dodge (MA)
Douglas C. Dreier (DC)
Caitlin Egleson (MA)
Prof. William N. Eskridge (CT)
Dawn Euer (RI)
Carol Garvan (ME)
Cary A. Glynn (NY)
Bruce Hale (MA)
Matthew Handley (DC)
Christine Hansico (NH)
Kathleen Hartnett (CA)
Kim Havlin (NY)
Cathy Harris (DC)
Prof. Claudia Haupt (MA)
Benjamin Hayes (DC)
Lisa Hays (MA)
Jordan D. Hershman (MA)
John Brent Hill (DC)
Brook Hopkins (MA)
Kurt Hughes (VT)
Dean Hutchinson (MA)
Rachel Hutchinson (MA)
Nathaniel J Hyman (MA)
Richard Iandoli (MA)
Robert Intile (MA)
Richard Jones (MA)
Prof. Courtney G. Joslin (CA)
Jeni Kaplan (MA)
Joyce Kauffman (MA)
Leon Kentworthy (DC)
Jennifer A. Kirby (MA)
Tiffany Knapp (MA)
Katherine Knox (ME)
Katherine Kraschel (CT)
Arielle Kristan (MA)
Kathryn Kuethman (NY)
Paul Lannon (MA)
David M. Lehn (DC)
Sharen Litwin (MA)
Gina-Marie Madow (MA)
Susan Manning (DC)
David Marcus (CA)
Lizz Matos (MA)
Lakeisha Mays (DC)
John N. McClain, III (NY)
Matthew McDonough (MA)
Daniel McFadden (MA)
Alysia Melnick (ME)
Anton Metlitsky (NY)
Catherine C. Miller (ME)
Shannon Minter (TX)
Ashley E. Moore (MA)
Prof. Douglas NeJaime (CT)
Juliette Niehuss (DC)
Prof. Christopher Northrup (ME)
Amy Null (MA)
Andrew O’Connor (MA)
Amy L. Pierce (CA)
Amy Christine Quartarolo (CA)
Tom Redburn (NJ)
Nolan L. Reichl (ME)
Atlee Reilly (ME)
Sarah Remes (MA)
G. David Rojas (IL)
Theresa M. Roosevelt (DC)
Alexandra Roth (NY)
Kathryn Rucker (MA)
Ellen Saidemen (RI)
Heather Sawyer (DC)
Matthe Schnall (MA)
Joseph Schneiderman (CT)
Alan E. Schoenfeld (NY)
Stephanie Schuster (DC)
Steven Schwartz (MA)
Richard M. Segal (CA)
Leah Segal (MA)
Giovanna Shay (CT)
Emily R. Shulman (MA)
Steven Silver (ME)
Andrew Silvia (MA)
Stephanie Simon (NY)
Meg Slachetka (NY)
Deirdre Smith (ME)
Nathaniel R. Smith (CA)
Paul M. Smith (DC)
Andrew Sokol (NY)
Anahita Sotoohi (ME)
David Soutter (MA)
Kate Stewart (MA)
Christopher Stoll (CA)
Jack Starcher (DC)
Corin Swift (NY)
Joel Thompson (MA)
Karla Torres (DC)
Juno Turner (NY)
Adam G. Unikowsky (DC)
Georgi Vogel-Rosen (RI)
Jill Ward (ME)
John P. Ward (RI)
Sarah Warlick (DC)
Ryan N. Watzel (DC)
Harrison J. White (CA)
Prof. Robert Williams (NJ)
Nicholas Willingham (DC)
Emma S. Winer (MA)
Prof. Tobias Wolff (PA)
Paul R.Q. Wolfson (DC)
Mary Zou (NY)
Melissa Hewey (ME)
David Nagle (MA)
Shane McCammon (DC)
Seth Harrington (MA)
Matthew Moses
Brittany Roehrs (NY)
Ethan Dowling (MA)
Drew DeVoogd (MA)
Courtney Herndon (MA)
Katharine Foote (MA)
Ariell Branson (NY)
Kim Havlin (NY)
Kathryn Kuethman (NY)
Paula Kates (NY)
Kathy Hong (NY)
Sahra Nizipli (NY)
Nikita Ash (NY)
Samantha Kokonis (NY)
Stephen Hogan-Mitchell (NY)
LAW FIRMS
Arent Fox LLP
Berman & Simmons
Bernstein, Shur, Sawyer & Nelson, PA
Brianchi, Brouillard, Sousa & O’Connell, P.C.
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Center For Public Representation
Cooley LLP
Disability Rights Maine
Foley Hoag LLP
Greater Hartford Legal Aid
Goodwin Procter LLP
Goodwin Procter LLP
Jenner & Block
King and Spalding LLP
Latham & Watkins LLP
Lightfoot Law Firm
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
MillerAsen P.A.
Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
O’Melveney & Myers LLP
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Pierce Atwood LLP
Pine Tree Legal Assistance
Ropes & Gray LLP
Rioux, Donahue, Chmelecki & Peltier, LLC
Sidley Austin LLP
Sullivan & Worcester LLP
White & Case LLP
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
INTERNS
Kris Berg
Dan Donovan
Jamie Fay
Jackie George
Sung Hee Lee
Deaunte Johnson
Li Kane
Alessandra Masso
Vanessa Nguyen
Natasha Novac
Vinny Owen
Liva Pierce
Jacob Rivera
Hailey Siegel-Freedman
Cashley Shepherd
Leah Spingarn
Dina Zingaro
VOLUNTEERS
Mario Albanese
Herbert Ayesiga
Dylan Berens
Deepvikram Borele
Nikki Burns
Andrew Cardamone
Patrick Ciano
Nicole Collins
Shirley Dulcey
Ivana Durov-Balesh
Chelsea Evanyke
Marni Forcht
Michelle Gallant
Alexander Gouvin-Moffat
Win Gustin
Wanyi H.
Michael Haley
Meredith Harris
Mike Hogan
Saba Ilkhani
Ali Javinani
Gabby Katz
Amulya Kaza
Emilie Khan-Boesel
Irwin Krieger
Karthik Krishna Jayaram
Pierre-Antoine Juge
Joshua Lakin
Alan Leung
Adam Luk
Sam Mason
Marc Mitchell
Paul Neumann
Vinny Owen
Liz O’Connor
Caylee Pallatto
Marina Raynis
E. Reese
Tony Rello
Evan Rockefeller
Kailash Rohatgi
Jennifer Siegel
Karen Silver
Daniel Soszynski
Corrine Summers
PJ & Jesse Strachman
Stacy Trosper
Joseph Valle
Mark Winders
Jamie Zheng
Dina Zingaro
INSTITUTIONAL DONORS
$100,000+
Deloitte Services LP
Gill Foundation
Klarman Family Foundation
Wellspring Philanthropic Fund
$25,000 – $49,999
Anonymous
Amalgamated Foundation
Galvan Foundation Charitable Trust
Krupp Family Foundation
Western Digital
$10,000 – $24,999
Akamai Technologies
Bain Capital
The Boston Foundation
Cadmus Group LLC
Eastern Bank
Fidelity Investments
Goodwin Law
Holland & Knight LLP
New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Rhode Island Foundation
The Ted Snowdon Foundation
Wellington Management Company LLP
$5,000 – $9,999
5 Star Travel Tzell
Atwater Wealth Management
The Boston Bar Association
Boston IVF
Boston Scientific
Boston University School of Law
Brown Advisory
Burns & Levinson LLP
Cambridge Savings Bank
Choate Hall & Stewart LLP
Cooley
Ernst & Young (EY)
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
Foley Hoag LLP
The Friendly Toast
GE
Goulston & Storrs
Evelyn & Walter Haas, Jr. Fund
Hinckley Allen
Hogan Lovells US LLP
Jackson Lewis PC
Latham & Watkins LLP
Law Offices of P. Christopher DiOrio
Lawson & Weitzen LLP
Mead, Talerman & Costa, LLC
Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC
Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
Prince Lobel Tye LLP
Robinson & Cole LLP
Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation
Ropes & Gray
Sidley Austin LLP
Sun Life Assurance
Susman Godfrey LLP
Vertex Pharmaceuticals
WilmerHale
Wolf Greenfield & Sacks PC
Yurko Partners PC
$1,000 – $4,999
Susan A. & Donald P. Babson Charitable Foundation
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Bike Safe Boston
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of RI
Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS
Brown Medicine, Inc
Cabot Corporation
Cerevel Therapeutics
The City of Providence
Freed Marcroft LLC
Hirsch Roberts Weinstein
Kotin, Crabtree & Strong
KPMG LLP
Littler Mendelson PC
Locke Lord
Massachusetts Commission on LGBTQ Youth
National Education Association of RI
Nichols, DeLisle & Lightholder, PC
Shawmut Design & Construction
Shepherd Financial Partners
United Healthcare
United Parish of Auburndale
Wildflour Bakery & Cafe
EQUAL JUSTICE COUNCIL MEMBERS
$250,000+
The Estate of Tim Stein in Memory of Wayne R. Fette
$100,000 – $249,999
Eric C. Green
Andrew S. & Samuel C. Pang, MD
Timothy Sabol & Judd Flesch
Scott Webster & Peter Black
$50,000 – $99,999
Will Evans
The Herrman Family
Judy Meelia
Ryan Offutt & Alex Pysarets
Ryan Pedlow & Cameron Kessel
$20,000 – $49,999
Anonymous (2)
Joanne Herman & Terry Fallon
Ralph & Janice James
Anita McGahan & Sarah Kaplan
Leslie Serchuck & Lynnae Schwartz
William Weiss
Richard J. Yurko
$10,000 – $19,999
Anonymous (5)
Mary L. Bonauto & Jennifer Wriggins
Nichole Bressner & Ian Wrigley
Hilary Bugbee
Cameron Baird Foundation
Steven Carlin & Michael Cormier
Mr. Matt Damon
Peter J. Epstein
Douglas P. Fiebelkorn & Andrew Hall
Lindsay Harrison & Jonna Hamilton
Rebecca Hart Holder & Molly Holder
Martin Koski & James Fitzgerald
Shari & Bob Levitan
Gregory Lewis
Judith Miles, Esq. & Renata Sos
Alix Ritchie & Marty Davis
Samantha Rosman & David Rosman
Jack Sansolo & Dean Waller
Mark D. Smith & John T. O’Keefe
$5,000 – $9,999
Anonymous (9)
Mark Allen
Ashley & Emily Banfield
Anna Bell & Annika Bockius-Suwyn
Adam Berger & Stephen Frank
Peter Brady & Alan Davis
Eoin Bullock
Gary Buseck
Darian Butcher
Amelia M. Charamba & Maralyn Wheeler
Prudence Crozier
Bill Dickey
Lisa J. Drapkin & Debbie Lewis
Nima & Kate Eshghi
Deborah Gaines & Jane Morgenstern
Daniel Grooms
David Halstead & Jay Santos
Mark Heumann & John Millea
Jane Hiscock & Marijean Lauzier
Dennis Hong
Jack Hornor & Ron Skinn
Richard Iandoli & Kai Bynum
Elizabeth C. Janeway
Joyce Kauffman & Annie Weatherwax
Lesbian Equity Foundation, Naomi Fine & Kathy Levinson
Jeanne Leszczynski & Diane DiCarlo
Sharen Litwin
Kathryn Livelli & Wendy Hinden
Mary K. Loeffelholz & Laura Green
Michael Manthei
Gwen Marcus & Nancy Alpert
Robert McBride
Paul Moreno & Stephen Barlow
Betty I. Morningstar & Jeanette Kruger
Jeffrey H. Munger & Robert T. Whitman
O’Hanlan-Walker LGBT Equality Fund
Shirley & Eric Paley
James M. Pierce
Scott Pomfret & Scott Whittier
David J. & Nancy Poorvu
Richard Rubinstein & John Morrel
Jacob Smith-Yang & Jason Smith
Anne Stanback & Charlotte Kinlock
Lee Swislow & Denise McWilliams
Mark R. Thall, M.D. & Tom Slavin
Ian & Eric Tzeng
Katherine & Kimberly Weir
Mark R. Young & Gary Sullivan
Ken & Jen Zolot
$3,000 – $4,999
Anonymous
Carole & Nancy Allen-Scannell
Phillip Bakalchuk
Hunter Baker & Bernard Gilmore
Mariterese & Patrick Balthrop
Bruce W. Bastian
Robert Bettiker & Robert Grundmeier
Edward S.W. Boesel
Kristen Bokhan
Gregory Van Boven & Robert Beck
Mark Brown & Kraig Kissinger
Jeff Butts & Ray Cheng
George Byars & Michael Spinelle
Mark Cohen & Jerry Hyman
David Colton & Hsein M. Khoo
Stanley Cushing & Daniel Lyons
Elizabeth Doherty
Meryl Epstein & Trish Nuzzola
Miren Etcheverry & Maureen McCarthy
David Gagne & Devan Dewey
Joseph Garland & Phillip Haines
Christiana N. Gianopulos
Paul Groipen & Todd Satterlee
John D. Hancock & Jay Wood
Harry Harkins & John Garger
Christopher Haynes
Carolyn Hotchkiss & Kathleen M. Cole
Cam & Joshua Judkins
Kathy Kaufmann
Robert H. King & Gary C. Jordan
Mark Krueger Charitable Fund at Tides Foundation
Joan A. Lenane & Sally A. Rose
Rob Levinson
Diane K. Lincoln
James Mattus & Trevor Fulmer
Hirschel McGinnis & David O’Dowd
Rolando Medina
Kendra Moore
Joyce Murdoch
Julie Murtagh & Marie Porzio
Beth Myers
Christine Nickerson & Inga Bernstein
Patricia A. Peard & Alice C. Brock
David Perkins & Willem van Schalkwyk
Luke Platzer
Fred Ramos & Bob Starmer
Sharon L. Rich & Nancy E. Reed
Shaw Rietkerk
Robert & Patricia Rivers
Stan & Martin Sclaroff
Bryan-Eric Simmons & Ralph Vetters
Daniel Spring
Charles Steenburg
Linda Z. Swartz & Jessica W. Seaton
Steven & Rebecca Taylor
Kevin A. Tedeschi
Kit Transue & Adrienne Shapiro
Jo Trompet & David Grebber
Vincent Tseng & Geoffrey Mainland
Donald Vaughan & Lee Ridgway
Edmund & Jane Walsh
Lisa Weissmann & Deb Shapiro
$1,978 – $2,999
Anonymous (9)
John Affuso
Michael Albert
Keplin Allwaters
Janice Ambrose & Marlene Seltzer
Sandy Anderson & Meg Wallace
Steven Backhaus & Jay Dee
Sharyn Bahn
Bruce Bell & George Smart
James Bennette & David Cowan
Susan Bernstein
Jan Bettencourt
Paul Biggar
Brianna Boggs & Sean Best
Kelly M. Bonnevie, Esq. & Karen Kaufman
Susan F. Brand, Esq
Kerry Brennan
David Briggs & John Benton
Jean-Phillip Brignol
David Brown
Edward Byrne
J. W. Carney, Jr. & Joy B. Rosen
Joanne Casper & Wendell Colson
A.M. Clark
Rich Coffman
Joyce Collier & Jennifer Potter
Robert Crackel
Brian Croteau
Fred Csibi-Levin & Daniel Levin
Michael Dillon
Nancy Douttiel & Diane Willcox
Nan Dumas
Shane Dunn & Elizabeth Bernardi & Family
Betsy Ehrenberg & Beth Eisenberg
Kathleen Entler & Jane Caufield
Elaine Epstein
Matthew Fecteau & Tristan Rushton
Jessyca Feliciano & Ashley White
Christopher Flynn & Daniel Newton
Ralph Freidin
Ken Gagne
Rachel Gerstein & Karen Eisenhauer
Gail E. Goodearl
Barbara & Jonathan Goose
Deborah Grabler
Barry Guthary & Robert Evensen
Sheridan Haines & Julie Crockford
Dean T. Hara
Bolton T. Harris, II & Robert Paul Breen
George-Henry Hastie
Dr. Catherine A. Hay & Kristine Clerkin
Deborah Heller & Ann Sanders
Kenneth Hirschkind
Sonia Hofkosh
Michael J. Izdepski & James Couchon
Amanda Johnston & Allison Sigrist
Arthur Kaplan & Duane Perry
John M. Kelly
Steve Kennedy
Ryan Kerr
Wendy Kirchick
Karen Kruskal & Sheera Strick
Stewart J. Landers, Esq.
G. Lee & Diana Humphrey
Stanley Lewicki
Maria Lopez
Keith J. MacDonald & Thomas P. Webber
Matt Maguire
Sara Malconian & Katherine Truscott
Marc Maxwell
Kenneth H. Mayer, M.D.
Matthew McTygue & Todd Rivers
David Mills
Neal Minahan
Jessica Mink
Frank C. Mockler & Stephen J. Griffin
Marianne Monte & Lisa Carcieri
Alexandria Mooney
Joe & Benjamin Muller
Kathy Mulvey & Patricia Lambert
David O’Brien
Rosemary Palladino & Marianne Brennick
Deborah & Ron Peeples
José F. Portuondo & Maria L. Wilson-Portuondo
William Powell
Oliver Radford & Stephen C. Perry
Naynay Rivers
Elizabeth Rosen & Pam Cobey
Carol Rosensweig, Esq. & Charlene D. Grant
Jill & Jane Rothenberg-Simmons
Elisabeth Sackton & Liz Coolidege
Matthew Sample
Jess & Robbie Samuels
Linda Serafini & Cathy Welsh
Mark Serchuck & John Casso
Mark Sexton & Kirk Wallace Fund of Stonewall Community Foundation
Karen Shack
Matthew Shakespeare & Fritz Backus
Joanne Shapiro
Paul Silva
Julia Slee & Beth Grierson
Clifford Sloan & Mary Lou Hartman
Joseph Smith & Scott Popkowski
Andrew Sorbo
Randall Steere
Caleb P. Stewart
Michael Sweeney
Matthew Teague
Aaron Tievsky
Gail Tsimprea & Francine M. Benes
Thomas G. J. Trykowski, AIA & Joseph Cacciola
Geoffrey W. Tuba
Rich Van Loan
Joyce Vyriotes
Ellen Wade, Esq. & Maureen Brodoff, Esq.
Andrew Wang
Arthur E. Webster, Esq.
John Welch
Elizabeth Welsh & Amy Brodigan
Jo Ann Whitehead & Bette Jo Green
Janson Wu & Adam Levine
Rodney L. Yoder & Michael J. Piore
LEGACY SOCIETY MEMBERS
Anonymous (4)
Carole & Nancy Allen-Scannell
Carol Alms
Jeff Anderson & Richard Schultz
Amy Aulwes & Warren Zola
Michael Baeder & David Wimberly
Sharyn Bahn
Gloria & Linda Bailey-Davies
Dawn Baumer & Rosie Hartzler
Bruce Bell & George Smart
Robert Bettiker & Robert Grundmeier
Linda Betzer
Dan Borges & David Hayter
Dr. Stephen Boswell & John Neale
Eva Boyce
Peter Brady & Alan Davis
Shelley Brauer & Jean Hey
Ann Briley
Bill Brindamour
David Brown
Dr. Paula G. Carmichael & Rev. Richelle Russell
David Cash
Patience Crozier & Jessica R. Keimowitz
Stanley Cushing & Daniel Lyons
Laura Diamond & Carolyn McDonald
Abby & Mary Diamond-Kissiday
Lisa J. Drapkin & Debbie Lewis
Nan Dumas
Shane Dunn & Elizabeth Bernardi & Family
Peter J. Epstein
Suzanne Estler
Adam Feinberg
Julia Fitz-Randolph Lesbian Innovations Fund at The Women’s Foundation of CO
Robert Flavell & Ronald Baker
Elizabeth Forrest & Leslie Horst
David F. Freedman
Christine Gestay
John Giso
Gail E. Goodearl
The Estates of Gloria Guarino & Van Chumacas
Holly Gunner & Anne Chalmers
Dean T. Hara
Harry Harkins & John Garger
Christopher Hartley & Micah Buis
Warren Hathaway & Ross Sneyd
Deborah Heller & Ann Sanders
Joanne Herman & Terry Fallon
Marcie Hershman
Gavin Hilgemeier
Joan Hilty
Kenneth Hirschkind
Jack Hornor & Ron Skinn
Rabbi Devorah Jacobson & Ms. Margaret Mastrangelo
John Kane
Joyce Kauffman & Annie Weatherwax
Terence Keane & Douglas Hughes
Robert H. King & Gary C. Jordan
Paul Kowal
Richard LaCroix
Linda Lankowski & Christine Jablonski
Arthur Lipkin & Robert Ellsworth
Marie Longo & Allison Bauer
Tony Maida & Anthony Volpe
Bruce Mandeville
Barbara L. Margolis, Esq. & Colleen J. Gregory, Ph.D.
Daniel Mauk & Mitchell Sendrowitz
Marc Maxwell
Richard D. McCarthy & Franc Castro Jr.
Laura McMurry
Brian McNaught & Raymond Struble
Robert Minnocci
Paul Moreno & Stephen Barlow
Jeffrey H. Munger & Robert T. Whitman
Allan Nault
Andrew S. & Samuel C. Pang, MD
Lynne E. Panico
Trevor Paulson
Patricia A. Peard & Alice C. Brock
Janet Peck & Carol Conklin
Kirk Pessner & Russ Miller
Mark Philibert & David Rooks
Scott Pomfret & Scott Whittier
Brian Quint
Chris Rainville
Nick & Sian Robertson
Richard Rubinstein & John Morrel
Takoma Sampson & Leah Whaley-Holmes
Jess & Robbie Samuels
Arnold Sapenter & Joseph Reed
Robert Seletsky
Robert Sessions
Mary & Jean B. Sevarese
Joanne Shapiro
Diane Smith
Tony Smith & David Ovalle
Andrew Sorbo
Trina Soske & Sarah Yedinsky
Scott Squillace, Esq.
Anne Stanback & Charlotte Kinlock
Kenneth Stilwell
Amalie Tuffin & Laura Lewis
Anthony Volponi
Herbert Walcoe
Robert Wasson
Karen & Marilyn Watson-Etsell
Kendall Watts & Robert Derry
Katherine & Kimberly Weir
Lisa Weissmann & Deb Shapiro
Tim Wernette
Jo Ann Whitehead & Bette Jo Green
Robert Wiggins
David Yalen
Peter Zupcofska & Robert Wilson
SUSTAINERS CIRCLE MEMBERS
Anonymous (11)
Brenda Abrams
Norma Adler & Susan Torrey
John Affuso
Gavin & Angelo Alexander
Sandy Anderson & Meg Wallace
Melanie Andrade & Kathy Wittman
John Argos & Robert G. Ross
Paul & Douglas Asher-Best
Carter Aubrey
Bryn Austin & Elizabeth Carver
Tamara Baca
Gloria & Linda Bailey-Davies
Mariterese & Patrick Balthrop
Ian Barnacle
Bill Bartels
Bruce W. Bastian
Michael Behrendt
Richard Bernache
Merle Bicknell & Jackie Gelb
Paul Biggar
Stephen Boehmke
Kristen Bokhan
Linda Bonelli
Mohan Boodram & Robert Morris
Celia Bozsum
Carrie Braverman & Evelyn Arinne Braverman
Lynne Brilliant & Wanda Shelton
Mark Brimhall
Mark Brown & Kraig Kissinger
Ellen Bunch
Kenneth Busch
Kathleen Bush & Mary Ritchie
Edward Byrne
Bruce Callahan & Tom Gagnon
J. W. Carney, Jr. & Joy B. Rosen
Susan Casavant
Richard Caswell
Bonnie Catena
Christopher Cerami
Albert Chan & Richard Possemato
Alexandra Chandler
Terri Charles
Marjorie Charney
David Chase & Gerard Cortinez
Huichun Chen
Lindsey Cimochowski & Bradley Rufleth
Frank Cincotti
Tina Cincotti
Truitt Clark
Lisa Cogliandro & Amanda Zuretti
Ilene Cohen & Susan Jacoby
Bradley Cohen
Lynn Colangione & Lauren Baskin
Katharine Colleran
David Colton & Hsein M. Khoo
Edward Cook
Amy & Garth Coombs
Jack Cox & Edwin Light
David Cruz & Steve Greene
Marla Cummins
Shamim Dada
Ellen C Davis
Stanley Davis
Elena Degago
Duane Dietz
Adrienne DiPrima
Brian Distelberg
Kelly Douglas
Daniel Dupuis
Betsy Ehrenberg & Beth Eisenberg
Nicholas Eustis
Susan Fahlund & Nancy LaPelle
Dan Ferrell
Timothy & Amber Fisher
Virginia Fitzgerald
Christopher Flynn & Daniel Newton
Edward Ford & Gilbert Arenaza
Anna Ford & Sara Watson
Anne Fowler & Samuel Allen
William Gabovitch
Marcia Garber
Robert Geary & Phi Hung Do
Mary Gentile & Mary Jacobsen
Yasmin Ghassab
Matthew Gibson
Saar Gill
Zachary & Gretchen Gingo
Gilbert Glick-Macalalad & Alex Macalalad
Jeffrey Goldsmith
Barbara & Jonathan Goose
Timothy Gordon
Gordon Gottlieb & Rob Krikorian
Sean Graham
Emily Gregoire
Bradley Gregory
Pat Grimm & Christina Klein
Amy Grundvig
Julienne Guerrero & Karen Zeman
Barry Guthary & Robert Evensen
Noe Gutierrez
Jimmy Haber
Caryl Haddock
Sheridan Haines & Julie Crockford
Lynn Halpern
Roberta Hambleton
Jeffery Hammerberg
Erin Harper
Deborah Heller & Ann Sanders
Deanna A Hence & Ryan Georgi
Gavin Hilgemeier
Christopher Hines
Kenneth Hirschkind
Dan Hochman & Martin Borys
Lenore Horner
D. Austin Horowitz & Mark Vigorito
Christopher Hossfeld
Spencer Icasiano
Thomas Ingle & Lee Stovall
Samantha Janosick
Colette Jaycox
Suriya Jeyadalan, M.D. & Cora Jeyadame
Michael Johnson
Jeffrey Jones & Mark Secord
Neal Kass
Peter Kassel & Thomas Tostengard
Joyce Kauffman & Annie Weatherwax
C. Keith & Stephen Simpson
Connor Kennedy
Stephen Kerrigan
Nicole Kinsley
Wendy Kirchick
David & Kristina Kirkham
Brad & Flint Kleinerman-Gehre
Jim Klopper
Leah & Jahna Knobler
Vincent Kornell
Jeffrey Kosbie
Michella Kras
Sophie & John Krentzman
Todd Kreps & Scott Best
John Kyper
Marc LaCasse & Todd Katzman
KitKat LaGines
Stacy LaiFook
Stewart J. Landers, Esq.
Robert Landino & Douglass Belote
Betty Landry
John Lapin
Gregory Larsen
Jane Lea & Jennifer Shannon
Erica LeBow & Megan Rising
Jose Lebron
Dana Leslie
Jeanne Leszczynski & Diane DiCarlo
Annmarie Levins & Linda Severin
Lin Lin
Justin Littman
Julie Lonergan
Paige Lowe
Stephanie Lowitt & Mason Weintraub
Kelly Ryan Lucas
Crissy Luna
Keith J. MacDonald & Thomas P. Webber
Kat MacDonald & Suzanne Abair
Ronald Madson & Richard Dietz
John Mandeville & Doug Lester
Christian Manke
Barbara L. Margolis, Esq. & Colleen J. Gregory, Ph.D.
J.E. Martin & Denise Howard
Andrew Martinez
Lois Mason & Christine Coughlan
Barbara J. Mathews
Kenneth H. Mayer, M.D.
Jason McCoy
Marly McGrath
Meghan McGrath
Nancy McLane & Karen Click
Vered Meir
Torr Melling
Michael Michael
Ellen Miller
Lisa Miller
David Mills
Kathleen Mills-Curran
Jessica Mink
Frank C. Mockler & Stephen J. Griffin
Kendra Moore
John Morrill
Kristina Morton
Fredric Moscowitz & John Stella
Francis Mule
Merkle Muller
Kathy Mulvey & Patricia Lambert
Niclas Nagler
Paul Neumann
James Newman
Christine Nickerson & Inga Bernstein
Sean Olbert
Brandon Orden
David Owens & Dennis Morin
Jennifer Parks
Olivia Parriott
Emily Pate
Andre Penn
Alton Phillips
Alexa Phomphakdy
Suzannah Pogue & Sandra Jones
José F. Portuondo & Maria L. Wilson-Portuondo
Robert Quinan & Steve Waddell
Emma Quinn-Judge
Chris Rainville
Vincent Reardon
Michelle Rediker & Sue Wedda
Amy Michelle Reinkemeyer
Brian P. Rice & Jason D. Kelliher
Maria L. Rico
Elisabeth Sackton & Liz Coolidege
Matthew Sample
Jess & Robbie Samuels
David Sander
Andrew Sayer
Kristin Schiff
Teresa Schubert
Johanna Schulman & Moira S. Barrett
Charles Screws
Sandra Seaman
Jessica Selinkoff
Erin Semagin Damio
Alison & Jordan Shea
El Sher
Deanna Sheridan
Bryan-Eric Simmons & Ralph Vetters
Alix Simonetti & Juliett Crawford
Julia Slee & Beth Grierson
Gary Slossberg
Mary Grace Smith
Sarah Smith
Paige Snelgrove
Kenneth Snyder
Andrew Sorbo
Trina Soske & Sarah Yedinsky
Randi Stein
Kathleen Stevens
Jessie Stickgold-Sarah & Robert Kindel
Stephan Stoeckl
Mark Sullivan & Albert Amodeo
Todd Swisher
Mandy & Leti Taft-Pearman
Laura Tenny
Shaunya Thomas
Kirk Thompson
Nicole Thomte
Carol Thornber
Thomas G. J. Trykowski, AIA & Joseph Cacciola
Ian & Eric Tzeng
Gregory Van Boven & Robert Beck
Donald Vaughan & Lee Ridgway
John Voight
Robert Volk & Kit Mui
David Walker
Caitlin Walsh
John P. Ward & Alain Balseiro
Lynsii Ward
Mark Weiss
John Welch
Linda Werner
Stacy Wetherhold
Michelle Wiener
Mark Wilen
Adam Williams
Jody Wilson
Nicholas Winston
Jim Witmer & Randall Meyer
Elizabeth Wohler
Pamela Wood
Stephenie Yeung & Alice De Young
Kathryn Zin